aerostack

Search Aerostack

Norwegian

Rydoo Accounts Payable AI invoice automation at Norwegian

MidAmerica St. Louis

GoodMaps indoor navigation at MidAmerica St. Louis Airport

Lyon Saint-Exupéry Airport

Stan robotic valet parking at Lyon Saint-Exupéry

London Heathrow

Facial-recognition eGates at Heathrow

Almaty International Airport

Q-Gate biometric passport-control terminals at Almaty

Pittsburgh International Airport

Arrow Analytics EZ-Board computer-vision carry-on analytics test at PIT Gate A7

Federal Aviation Administration

FAA SMART airspace and trajectory management platform

Dubai International

Dubai Police AI systems for passenger screening, unattended baggage and camera analysis at Dubai airports

Airport intelligence / Montevideo Carrasco

Carrasco's passenger-flow instrumentation predates its platform upgrade

Xovis reports years of sensor use at Carrasco and later onboarding to AERO. The supplier's chronology does not establish independent queue reductions.

The picture at Montevideo Carrasco

The operating and procurement record

Longstanding sensors can be updated without replacing an entire terminal operating process. There is a stronger research opportunity here than simply repeating that the supplier has served the airport for seven years. Carrasco could explain how its operational decisions changed as sensing coverage developed. Without that history, a long customer relationship tells us little about measurable improvement.

Long use is not measured success. The customer relationship could offer the airport a useful historical record of waiting times and how staff assignments changed with better observations. But no such airport-verified analysis appears in the present evidence.

Xovis references more than seven years of use and AERO platform onboarding reported in 2024. The supplier's long customer history does not describe one continuous unchanged installation. Sensor generations, locations and operating procedures could have altered during that period.

A platform refresh matters only if decision-makers use its information.

Selected implementations

What is sourced

01 / Deployed · limited scope

Carrasco's passenger-flow instrumentation predates its platform upgrade

The operational problem

Terminal managers need to identify and respond to persistent processing pressure.

What the sources report

Vendor accounts describe Carrasco's Xovis passenger-flow technology.

Why it matters

A longer installation history provides a potential basis for comparative performance.

What remains unproven

No independently supported AI model, current sensor scope or outcome comparison is available.

Sources and verification (2)

Airport Technology (Xovis interview) · Evidence grade B

Xovis case study (undated) · Evidence grade C

Evidence supports a reported claim; it does not automatically establish a measured operating benefit.

The wider register

What else is happening at Montevideo Carrasco?

Installed airport technology, supplier proposals and AI-specific functions are recorded separately in the wider register.

No additional publicly listed deployment records.

Editorial assessment

Carrasco offers the possibility of examining several years of flow measurement. The missing evidence is how the data affected real resource decisions.

Live data from the Aerostack register. Status reflects published evidence only. See Our approach for how records are graded.

Aerostack tracks AI deployments across airports and airlines, with the published evidence behind each record. Photography is real aviation imagery. Record thumbnails may show the named airport or airline; other photographs do not.