aerostack

Search Aerostack

Norwegian

Rydoo Accounts Payable AI invoice automation at Norwegian

MidAmerica St. Louis

GoodMaps indoor navigation at MidAmerica St. Louis Airport

Lyon Saint-Exupéry Airport

Stan robotic valet parking at Lyon Saint-Exupéry

London Heathrow

Facial-recognition eGates at Heathrow

Almaty International Airport

Q-Gate biometric passport-control terminals at Almaty

Pittsburgh International Airport

Arrow Analytics EZ-Board computer-vision carry-on analytics test at PIT Gate A7

Federal Aviation Administration

FAA SMART airspace and trajectory management platform

Dubai International

Dubai Police AI systems for passenger screening, unattended baggage and camera analysis at Dubai airports

Airport intelligence / Tokyo Narita

Narita's security robot patrol is an early deployed example

SECOM's cocobo robot is documented as patrolling Narita in 2022. The record supports a physical security application, but does not establish the current extent or operating benefit.

Aerial view of Narita International Airport, May 2025
Aerial view of Narita International Airport, May 2025. Photograph: LMP 2001 / CC BY-SA 4.0 (cropped to fit). Shows the airport, not an AI implementation.
The picture at Tokyo Narita

The operating setting

Airport patrols involve repetitive observation across public spaces. A mobile robot can collect and process information along a route, but useful alerts must still reach a person with responsibility to act.

Narita's cocobo story predates the current wave of generative-AI assistants. This is a security-device application with different validation requirements.

Selected implementations

The application and the limits of the evidence

01 / Deployed

Narita's security robot patrol is an early deployed example

The operational problem

Security staff need to identify incidents without relying solely on a robot's interpretation of what it sees.

What the sources report

Industry and supplier accounts in June 2022 describe SECOM's AI-labelled cocobo robot patrolling Narita.

Why it matters

The defined operating setting makes questions about patrol coverage, intervention and false alerts practical rather than theoretical.

What remains unproven

No recent source verifies continued service, autonomous coverage or independent security performance.

Sources and verification (2)

Groovy Japan · Evidence grade B

SECOM · Evidence grade C

Evidence supports a reported claim; it does not automatically establish a measured operating benefit.

The wider register

What else is happening at Tokyo Narita?

The wider register below keeps any other recorded technology separate from this selected operational story. Its source and status should be assessed independently.

No additional publicly listed deployment records.

Aerostack assessment

An updated account from Narita or its security operator would determine whether this remains a live operating example.

The published sources remain available alongside the underlying implementation record; claimed results should retain their original attribution.

Live data from the Aerostack register. Status reflects published evidence only. See Our approach for how records are graded.

Aerostack tracks AI deployments across airports and airlines, with the published evidence behind each record. Photography is real aviation imagery. Record thumbnails may show the named airport or airline; other photographs do not.