aerostack

Search Aerostack

Norwegian

Rydoo Accounts Payable AI invoice automation at Norwegian

MidAmerica St. Louis

GoodMaps indoor navigation at MidAmerica St. Louis Airport

Lyon Saint-Exupéry Airport

Stan robotic valet parking at Lyon Saint-Exupéry

London Heathrow

Facial-recognition eGates at Heathrow

Almaty International Airport

Q-Gate biometric passport-control terminals at Almaty

Pittsburgh International Airport

Arrow Analytics EZ-Board computer-vision carry-on analytics test at PIT Gate A7

Federal Aviation Administration

FAA SMART airspace and trajectory management platform

Dubai International

Dubai Police AI systems for passenger screening, unattended baggage and camera analysis at Dubai airports

Airport intelligence / Teesside International

Teesside's autonomous vehicle programme has a defined trial, not a completed fleet

Aurrigo signed a development agreement covering autonomous baggage and passenger movement at Teesside in 2025. The planned shuttle start needs later operating evidence.

The picture at Teesside International

The operating picture

Moving people and baggage on repeatable airport routes presents different safety and supervision problems. At Teesside the critical question is what the airport actually authorised the vehicles to do once the agreement was signed. A supervised demonstration and an unattended service can look similar in a photograph. Their safety cases are not equivalent.

A contract is not a service. An airport must decide where the vehicle may operate, who supervises it and what happens at a pedestrian crossing or congested stand. The announced development deal does not answer those practical questions.

Aurrigo announced a £1 million agreement in August 2025 with a proposed Auto-Shuttle start in October. The distinction between a passenger shuttle and an autonomous baggage vehicle is substantial. One must safely accommodate people; the other has to operate around handlers and aircraft equipment.

A development agreement is a credible next step but cannot prove unattended operation.

Selected implementations

The evidence behind the application

01 / Pilot

Teesside's autonomous vehicle programme has a defined trial, not a completed fleet

The operational problem

Airport staff need vehicles to recover safely when a route is blocked or a passenger needs assistance.

What the sources report

The agreement covers the development and trial of Aurrigo autonomous vehicles at Teesside.

Why it matters

The airport provides a test setting for both passenger and baggage applications.

What remains unproven

The present record does not independently verify the planned start date, AI control methods or completed test outcomes.

Sources and verification (2)

Autonomous Vehicle International · Evidence grade B

Aurrigo (official) · Evidence grade B

Evidence supports a reported claim; it does not automatically establish a measured operating benefit.

The wider register

What else is happening at Teesside International?

The rest of the airport register retains other reported activity with distinct maturity, ownership and source evidence.

No additional publicly listed deployment records.

Editorial assessment

Teesside has a genuine autonomy experiment with two different use cases. The first strong result would be an airport-confirmed test report addressing route safety and human supervision.

Live data from the Aerostack register. Status reflects published evidence only. See Our approach for how records are graded.

Aerostack tracks AI deployments across airports and airlines, with the published evidence behind each record. Photography is real aviation imagery. Record thumbnails may show the named airport or airline; other photographs do not.